Leading And Managing

Question: Discuss about theLeading And Managing. Answer: Introduction: There are various kinds of leadership styles that are adopted by many world leaders. In this case we shall discuss multicultural and evolution of leadership. Analysis of the Leadership Styles The world today is a global village whereby people can move anywhere with ease. The technological advancements have simplified the modes of travel thus individuals from any part of the world can settle anywhere. In this sense, leaders must understand the kind of subjects that they exercise their influence upon. A leader is assumed to be an ethical and charismatic person but the need to evaluate the people being governed is paramount. (Muna et al. 2010). For instance, there are many dynamics that are taking place in various organisations and nations. The implications of these changes are that the leaders should keep up with the rapid pace to comprehend the details in the evolution of their subjects. More so, they should anticipate the challenges that come with the changes and also utilise the many opportunities that arise from them. (Johnson 2006, p. 333-345) A multicultural leader should be aware of their past and how it drives their perception of current world phenomena. This will compel them to relate their experience to other livelihoods of different parts of the globe. Once they are acquainted with these facts, they should interconnect them in a manner that is coherent with cultural expectations. More specifically we examine the multicultural way of leadership exhibited by Abdul Sattar Edhi, Nelson Mandela and Mahatma Gandhi. (Shippy 2009, p. 60-65) Abdul Sattar Edhi was born of poor parents in a humble village. He had an opportunity to care for his sick mother who later died. She had suffered critical mental disorder that led to her demise. The years of devastation were a training experience for Edhi who grew up as a philanthropic personality with a great sense of compassion towards people. He was not so much endowed with money but he did his best to empower others. At some point he engaged his peers to start beneficial programmes but they differed in ideologies, so he pursued his own course. During the colonial era, there were prejudicial tendencies that suppressed women. Edhi launched his foundation that aimed to emancipate them. He began with a single ambulance and later grew the foundation together with his wife and children. He attributes his personality to the Muslim teachings that inculcated good values in him. (Kohler 2016, p. 456-467) Born in 1918, Nelson Mandela was a South African leader who grew up to fight for freedom. The South African country was embroiled in apartheid systems that led to segregation and torture of the Africans. Nelson Mandela was instrumental in the fought against the laws through formation of the African National Congress. (Branson et al. 2011). This movement led to his imprisonment for twenty seven years in the Robben Islands. He inspired other leaders to stand up against forms of discrimination. Nelson Mandela to transform the society to embrace education which he believed would empower them. His influence was felt even while he was in prison because the struggle was kept vibrant by his countrymen. After leaving prison, he rose to presidency as the first black president of South Africa. This country was dominated by different cultures including the whites. Mandela is credited for incorporating all races in his government and he did not act in any way to revenge for the injustices caused upon his life. Some of the whites served in his government. Until today, Mandela has a strong legacy as a transformational leader who is rated among other great world leaders. (Kezar 2008, p. 78-88) Mahatma Gandhi was born in 1869 in the northwest regions of India. He was privileged to attend school and later he got married. Gandhi moved to South Africa at the time when apartheid laws were highly effective. While staying there, he witnessed how Indians and Africans were mistreated. At some point he was ejected out of a train on the grounds of race. He later went back to India where he strived to create awareness for his fellow Indians to stand up against British rule. (Ramakrishnan 2013, p. 87-90) There are many lessons that can be derived from Mahatmas multicultural style of leadership. He embraced justice for every individual. He also advocated for value addition in the lifestyle of a human being. Through Mahatma, humanity was upheld because he respected people from all walks of life. (Schein 2010, p. 311-318). He did not put any boundaries between the social strata or occupational diversities. His determination to eliminate development barriers was triggered by the desire to have an enlightened nation apart from just being independent. Comparison of the Leadership Styles The leaders exhibit many similarities in their styles. For instance, all of them had a sense of compassion for humanity and this was the driving force that made them to fight for equality. Another factor that made them similar is the desire to have a society that is free from any form of discrimination. The only difference that comes out is the method applied to fight for the grievances. For instance, Mandela employed violent means while Gandhi was a peaceful demonstrator. In the contemporary economy, Mahatmas system is applicable because he was flexible and willing to learn. Therefore, the system can accommodate the rapid economic changes as well. (Muna et al. 2010). Communication Styles In addition, there were disparities in communication styles. Mandela was locked up in prison hence he communicated through other parties whereas Mahatma gave first hand information to his followers. Edhis style of communication is a little different because the other two leaders were national leaders whereas he was an organisational leader. (Shippy 2009, p. 60-65) In terms of multicultural leadership, the three personalities have been respected across the world. In their biographies, they portray themselves as leaders who have visions. It is true that their success was evident from their initial growth stages. Leadership was a trait that they learnt at the youthful ages and they nurtured it to become world renowned figures. They all have childhood stories that literally pushed them to adopt the courses that now distinguish them. (Branson et al. 2011). Conclusion In conclusion, leadership is not a discipline that can be studied in class. One must possess the innate skill and desire to serve the people. References Branson, M. L., MartiÃÅ' nez, J. F. (2011). Churches, Cultures Leadership: a practical theology of congregations and ethnicities, 9(21), 234-241 Johnson, P. B. (2006). Everyone Is Multicultural: bridging cultural influences for leadership success . New York, iUniverse, 3(6), 333-345 Kezar, A. J. (2008). Rethinking Leadership in A Complex, Multicultural, And Global Environment: new concepts and models for Leadership, 45(5-9), 78-88 Kohler, R. (2016). Optimization Of Leadership Style: new approaches to effective multicultural leadership in ... international, 28(3), 456-467 Muna, F. A., Zennie, Z. A. (2010). Developing Multicultural Leaders The Journey To Leadership Success . Houndmills, Basingstoke, 42(4), 45-67 Ramakrishnan, K. (2013). Managerial Leadership in Multicultural Organisations. [Place of publication not identified], Prentice-Hall, 39(8), 87-90 Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 87(7), 311-318 Shippy, M. A. (2009). Cultural Fluidity Adaptability Factors Of Multicultural Leaders Within The U.S. Business Context . Cincinnati, 12(7), 60-65