Organization and Management Analysis Essay

disposalal and counselling outline argon an essential part of system of rulesal environs. In the recent world, causeing surroundings characteristics be team work, delegation, discipline technology interfaces, which have an impact on the potentiality of organization and commission. This helps in cost reduction, decrease in environmental waste, improved employee satisfaction and an increase in over e very(prenominal) productivity. To have an organizational and management analysis review of organizational charts, meeting with department passenger vehicles, executives or board members, and an organizational survey is necessary (J iodines, 2006). A multi-dimensional examination of organizational and management analysis gives a complete picture of the actual situation which so-and-so be a starting point. This paper is to break various organizational theories, compares management theories and modalitys, and explains which organizational possibility and management style rese mbles our organization. Also, this paper explains what could be changed to sour our organization punter.organisational TheoriesOrganizational surmise is to localise how they solve problems and how they maximize efficiency and productivity. These theories mostly derived from the activities of winning organizations. All of these theories contributes to the over exclusively dateing of management. As in any other theories organizational theories provide the tush for ongoing research and application of human port in organizational settings.Classical Organizational hypothesisFocus on the theories of efficiency. The comp angiotensin-converting enzyments include scientific management, bureaucratic possible action, and administrative theory. Scientific management focus on getting the outmatch from the people, equipment, and business. So that productivity mass be increased. In this, the workers got scientifi abusey selected, trained and taught for the work. On the other hand, bure aucratic theory focus on establishing a hierarchy, division of labor, rules, and regulations. In the current world, many a(prenominal) of the directors return that bureaucratic theory is a enlistment to employees creativity. Administrative theory establishes a set of management principles and functions that applied to the organizations. This serves as a centralized finis fashioning burn down (Coulter & Robbins, 2012).Neoclassical Organization possibilityThis theory emphasizes impelling and sociopsychological aspects of human behaviors in an organization. As we face in many of the current organizations many of the music directors motivate, lead, build trust, work with the team, manage conflicts is all establish on the organizational performance approach. The way four-in-hand image hypothecates, work with the employees, the method of conference is cosmopolitan in the behavioral approach. Productivity increases in an environment with coherence of values and purpose. The k ey is to maintain proportionality where subordinates respect and believe theatre directorial authority (Chron, 2014). incident TheoryThis is a management approach that recognizes all(prenominal) organization as divergent, which means that each organization faces distinguishable situations and call fors contrary ways of managing. This helps the management to understand that at that place are no universal rules for directors to follow. kinda of relishing into the universal rules, the manager must look on to the individual situation and determine the best and efficient way to manage the situation ideally. diametrical changing circumstances require managers to use different approaches and techniques. There are no simple or complex rules to follow. Managers are able to take decisions ground on the conditions (Coulter & Robbins, 2012).Systems TheoryThe system theory approach explains that organizations take information form the environment and transforms these resources into outputs into the environment. This theory explains the interrelatedness of all parts of an organization and how one change in one area cigarette affect multiple other parts. In this, all the units work together to achieve the organizational goals. Organization depends upon inputs form capital, government regulations, suppliers, information technology, human resources, to bear the output of financial results, products, services and information (Liebler & McConnel, 2012).Organizational theory suits our OrganizationThe organizational theory that virtually resembles our organization is theContingency Theory. Adapting to the sore changes in the environment is the basis for Contingency theory. This theory is important for managerial and organizational success. We have recently adopted electronic Medical Records, and we are in the adaptation show of information technology. Manager takes decision based on the current circumstances, which is logical because the units within our organi zation differ in size, structure, capacity, work activities, and goals. So a universally acceptable theory will not work in all situations. Different situations require different theories of management. Some situation the division of labor and bureaucratism is desirable which supports the classic theory. Other situations structural forge becomes effective. Depends on the situation the manager takes the stand. Contingency theory claims that there is no best way to design an organization. There is no written rule on what is the best or the universal solution for the problems in our organization. There is no best way to point a corporation or to lead a company. Also, the theory that works in our organization whitethorn not work for other organizations (Coulter & Robbins, 2012).Compares focal point Theories and StylesManagers communication with the subordinates reflects a cluster of styles which the management styles. Managers use different style in different situations. Generally, w e can see one style generally emerges as the paramount mode of interaction. Autocratic manager makes independent decisions without ofttimes input from subordinates. The manager clearly dictates what, how, when and where things for the employees there is no room for employee initiatives. An autocratic style is least effective and desirable for motivating employees. some other management style is the bureaucratic management style in which the manager follows the rule and ensures that the employees follow the rules as well . They go by the book and the rules and enforced strictly. In this, the employees have it away less freedom. No exceptions permitted. Participative management is which the manager makes the terminal decisions, but the employees are involved in this process. both(prenominal) the manager and the employees involved in the decision making process. Decision made as a sticking group interaction. Everyone might not accept managers decision. Another type is the capit alistic style in which the manager allows employees to manage their own work. No supervision provided. In this, theindividuals should be self-motivated. This can result in disorganization, loony bin and lack of direction. Finally, in Paternalistic style the manager makes the decision to benefit the employees. Manager treats employees like children. In this style, the employees become dependent on their manager (Liebler & McConnell, 2012).Management Theory and Style suits our OrganizationIn our organization, there is no one management style that fits to all situations. In my observation, the managers shifts form one style to another when they face different groups and situations. When it comes to the policies and procedures, in my observation it is bureaucratic style, top level managers are following autocratic management style, and my immediate manager has a participative style who consults with the employees for decision making. So remote I have not encountered any Laissez-faire management style in our place. In the new hire orientation managers follow paternalistic style. For a successful manager, the management style depends on the disposed situation. If a work environment does not require any close supervision, the managers may select any styles. When employees are unskilled, autocratic style is most efficient. In the current world, changes impacts the managers task. It includes economic and semipolitical uncertainty, ethical issues, security threats, and changing technology. All these call for different management styles depends on the managers involvement.Changes towards Organizational AdvancementOrganizations deal with challenges in this world(a) economic climate, changing technology and increased globalization. A manager should understand the critical issues and use skills and abilities during dispute times in an organization. A great manager can change your life, encourage employees professionally and personally, come alive people to overcome c hallenges and instill team spirit. such a manager can make job enjoyable and productive. Manager should create an environment in which the organization members can work to the best of their abilities and think creatively. In order to make the organization better people should support, coach, and find meaning and fulfilment in work. Also have up-to-date information about the new innovative ideas. It is important to be free-enterprise(a) and sustain in thebusiness world. Develop the net running(a) ability, return effectively and be sincere and genuine with others (Coutler & Robbins, 2012). shutdownIn conclusion as we have seen in any organizational performance, managerial ability is very important in creating organizational values. Different management theories and styles range from prohibiting staff from making any decisions to to the full delegating the decision-making power. No management style is systematically effective. Situational factors should be taken into consideration in the extract of an effective and efficient management style. The study of organizational theories and management styles is essential in this modern organizational, working environment.ReferencesChron. (2014). Organizational Theory. Retrieved from http//httpwww.smallbusiness.chron/organizational-theory. Coulter, M. & Robbins, S.P. (2012). Management. (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ prentice Hall. Jones, J. (2006). How to Analyze an Organizational Structure. Retrieved from http//www.smallbusiness.chron.com/analyze-organizational-structure-11818.html. Liebler, J.G. & McConnell C.R. (2012). Management Principles for Health Professionals. (6th ed.). Sudbury, MA Jones and Bartlett.